“Ah Khan Syed,” the pseudonym whistleblower who authors
recently wrote an article about “fairy tales”:His TLDR supplied in the abstract reads as follows:
Not only was there a virus, but it wasn't flu and it did result in deaths. Yet there is so much more to the story...
Sadly for Mr. Arkmedic, his entire article is a perfect example of the non sequitur logical fallacy. Armkedic’s argument runs as follows:
The origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in Wuhan biolab was covered up:
Video of secret meeting between Fauci and NIH on 1 Feb, 2020.
Stop arguing over side-show speculations:
Arkmedic’s article “It doesn’t matter.”
More people were dying in 2020 than usual:
England’s death rate skyrocketed in March-April 2020: “something happened in the UK (and many European countries) that definitely caused more deaths that year.”
The vast majority of the excess deaths were caused by State-sponsored maltreatment of pneumonia:
Withholding antibiotics like azithomycin for pneumonia (#3tablets scandal) for the elderly;
These people had “positive COVID tests”
pretty much all the COVID deaths were in the post-viral phase. Which means something else other than an active virus killed all those people. And that something else was pretty much either bacterial pneumonia (treatable with antibiotics), atypical pneumonia (treatable with antibiotics) or blood clots (rare, but treatable with anticoagulants). That’s assuming they weren’t euthanised before they got to any of those things
The unvaccinated were deliberately put on pneumonia maltreatment-to-death pathways.
Excess deaths also caused by State-sponsored involuntary euthanasia of the elderly:
Deliberate neglect (Amnesty Report);
Administration of midazolam, haloperidol and levomeprozine and other fatal end-of-life “care” drugs to elderly in (usually specific) hospitals and care homes;
“PCR tests somewhat drove the casedemic, but are not in themselves enough to account for the illnesses and the deaths.”
If a disease is not prevalent, PCR false-positivity rate is high, especially when testing an asymptomatic population.
If a disease is prevalent, PCR false-positivity rate is low.
The calculated positivity rate of PCR in NSW during Omicron was 80%.
THEREFORE:
The real take home from this article is that there was a virus that was associated with a spike in deaths. The arguments that you might see such as “viruses don’t exist”, “there was no virus”, “it was just flu” are false and are intended to distract, conflate and discredit you from discussing the number 1 issue:
Many of those deaths could have been avoided.
In order for the deaths to have occurred in the presence of a real virus with low pathogenicity it was necessary not only to scare the population but also to run a psychological operation that allowed the ridicule and discrediting of dissenters who were led to believe either that “there was a scary novel virus that couldn’t be treated” or that there “was no virus” and “COVID was just false positive PCR tests”.
None of these were true. What is true is the following:
There was a virus (or an infectious clone of a virus, which is the same thing) of usual pathogenicity.
PCR tests have limitations, but if you have symptoms of a viral disease and you test positive for that viral disease on a PCR you probably have the disease.
If you don’t have symptoms of the disease and you test positive, you are more likely not to have the disease but it doesn’t matter because nothing will happen to you. The sole purpose of testing asymptomatic people was to scare the population.
If you took a PCR test for COVID and tested positive you would be denied the very antibiotics that would prevent your death from pneumonia.
If you were elderly in a nursing home and the nursing home staff, living in fear of COVID, decided that the nursing home had a COVID infestation due to someone testing positive (whether it was real or not), there was a good chance that you would be euthanised by midazolam if you showed the slightest sign of an infection or other condition requiring hospital attendance.
And that, dear reader, is COVID.
Sorry buddy. That’s a non sequitur and you know it. You have presented zero evidence in your presentation that:
There was a new virus, unique from all other alleged viruses;
It is the sole aetiological cause of the alleged illness, COVID-19;
COVID-19 is a disease with unique symptoms;
COVID-19 can be spread from person-to-person;
PCR is capable of reliably detecting it and nothing else.
Contrary to your blind assertion that “exactly how this virus managed to maintain spread and prevalence for 3 years is another matter altogether,” a more reasonable conclusion drawn from your mostly true propositions nos. 3, 4 and 5 (1, 2 and 6 are smoke and mirrors for clown world participants) would have been:
THEREFORE: No new virus or disease was required to account for the excess “pandemic” deaths; they can be adequately explained by state-sponsored maltreatment for pneumonia; the administration of state-sponsored involuntary euthanasia; and the deployment of a flawed testing regime which determined life (“negative” = normal treatment, antibiotics, etc) or death (“positive” = intubation, remdesivir, midazolam, antibiotics withheld) pathways for attendees of the medical system, particularly the unvaccinated, between 2020 and 2022. The “pandemic” was entirely State-caused.
With the supply of some additional information, namely, the deliberate misapplication of COVID-19 vaccine deaths to the COVID-19 death tally, and the role of the mainstream media’s ritual spellcasting propaganda apparatus to seed the belief of a novel virus and a dangerous new illness in the public consciousness, where it largely remains to this day, a more logically satisfying and complete picture emerges.
There was no “novel viral” pandemic. People got sick, people died, absolutely, but the “why” was not the result of a new invisible boogeyman out spreading death among the population. The why was a new era of totalitarian evil, rolled out globally, where the States, in coordinated union, decided that certain undesirables could be sacrificed in highly publicised and repetitively broadcast death rituals in an effort to persuade the masses to believe they needed the protection of the State from a “deadly invisible fairy,” a novel virus and its alleged causative illness, after which they desperately partook of the Holy Substance, got sick or died, and were conveniently included in the same propagandistic case/death tally they themselves had subsumed from their TV or propaganda device as the reason to participate. No new virus required. No new disease required.
To his credit, at least Arkmedic readily admitted that “COVID-19” is readily treatable. I argue, however, not with his HCQ, ivermectin, antibiotics or vitamin D (although those are critically important for addressing the other reasons people ended up in hospital between 2020 and the present), but with a hearty dose of non-compliance with Government-sposored death diktats and wholehearted, logically robust dismissal the propaganda apparatus’s endless fairy tales about “deadly viruses.” Our beliefs do matter, for beliefs drive behaviour.
Why a usually adept-at-critical-thought individual like Arkmedic has such a hard time admitting There Was No Pandemic (of a novel viral illness) continues to amaze me. As I argued in my “Virology’s Fatal Flaw”:
But the shoe of severe consequences also fits the other foot. If there is no ‘contagious and deadly virus’ spreading from person to person; if COVID-19, like AIDS before it, is a disease with a myriad of complex contributing factors, and/or deliberate classification errors; if the entire field of virology is based on a single, fatal, logical flaw, then it must follow that the administration of unnecessary vaccines, ‘antiviral’ treatments and the throwing away of trillions of global taxpayer dollars chasing the winds of illusory SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 medicines, societal ‘New Normal’ interventions, and research grants, will inevitably cause more harm than good to the general public.
True and false beliefs matter.
Thank you for reading and analyzing that fallacy-ridden rubbish from Arkmedic. I had started on it but didn't have your fortitude! A whole bunch of "Covid dissidents" have been coming out as virus pushers, e.g. Engler.
The closing sentence is the key to understand why we fall for all sorts of twisted stories, incomplete expressions, vague promises, understatements or plain lies. It goes for everything, from a primary school to nationwide elections, from family secrets to corporate fraud, from self-delusion to fake CVs.
The contents is irrelevant. WE are the driving force behind the lie mechanism. We even bleach our souls to pass lies as greater good.
By analogy: (theoretically) the virus is irrelevant, the terrain determines the outcome - according to some. Or the other way round, according to others.
It really doesn’t matter. What truly matters is that we are ready to extreme lengths to deceive others and equally ready to deceive ourselves. It will always be a losing game. Maybe it’s a great time to ponder about this all and change the underlying mental corruption.